Friday, June 15, 2012


Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Press Release                  

Friday, June 15, 2012

The BC Supreme Court released its decision in Carter v. AG Canada today. The decision carves exceptions into the laws allowing Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Canada.
The Federal Parliament of Canada recently considered legalization of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in a bill that came before the House in 2010. Bill C-384 was overwhelmingly defeated based upon concerns related to the prospect of the abuse of seniors, people with disabilities, the lack of an effective national suicide prevention strategy, and the lack of access to good palliative care in Canada.

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Executive Director Alex Schadenberg states:
Parliament's overwhelming defeat of Bill C-384 months ago reflects that there has not been a change in social consensus since the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in the case of Rodriguez v. AG BC in 1993. 
Today's court decision is fundamentally at odds with the will of Parliament as expressed just months ago and is fundamentally anti-democratic. 
EPC counsel Hugh Scher notes:
EPC is concerned about the safety, security and equality of people with disabilities and seniors which is central to the protections set out under our Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our Criminal Code.

EPC-BC chair Dr. Will Johnston states:
Most elder abuse is hidden from view - and if we can't detect the abuse now, how are we going to do it when the stakes are raised? I have seen how easily influenced older people can be, and how inadequate are our national strategies against suicide. The present decision, which should be immediately appealed and corrected, is a huge step backwards, a blow to public safety, and would force changes in public policy which would do more harm than good.  
Dr. Johnston notes that:
Today's decision would point Canada towards the Oregon assisted suicide regime, which has become notorious for its erosion of medical standards and abuse of psychiatry to rubber-stamp suicide requests. The wish to avoid Oregon's mistakes has been reflected in over 100 rejections of assisted suicide by legislatures in North America and by medical associations around the world. 
EPC is urging the Crown to immediately appeal this decision to the BC Court of Appeal and to seek an order that stays the effect of the decision until such time as that appeal is heard.

For further information, please contact:
Alex Schadenberg, EPC Executive Director: (519) 851-1434,
Dr. Will Johnston, EPC-BC Chair: (604) 220-2042
Hugh Scher, EPC Legal Counsel: (416) 816-6115

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition - Box 25033 - London, Ontario N6C 6A8 - 1-877-439-3348


Anne in Vernon said...

This is a devastating and frightening decision that the B.C. Supreme Court has made. It reminds me of a decision that the B.C. Supreme Court made in January 2011.

A B.C. health authority requested a court order to ban -- forever -- a video taken with a hidden camera showing staff at a nursing home physically assaulting an elderly man.

The court order was granted. No staff were punished in any way.

The health authority spokesperson said that the reason they sought the court order was "to protect staff privacy".

When "staff privacy" can trump the right to a person's safety and life, Canada has now slipped into the ranks of Syria, and its ilk.

Story link:

TLC in SK said...

Roy - there are many alternatives to alleviate suffering. Not everyone who suffers wants to end their life. And how about the elderly being offered assisted suicide in instead of healthcare Oregon? That doesn't make you question this?